|
|
Post by James on Jul 8, 2006 14:25:44 GMT -5
p100.ezboard.com/fmicronationalnewsnetwork48264frm35.showMessage?topicID=9.topic"Should a micronation be organised along the lines of a confederacy, defined as a union of states where power remains predominantly in the hands of member states, as opposed to a federation, each micronation shall be considered to possess a separate military unless stated otherwise, and all issues of command and calculation shall be decided accordingly. ----- In practice, this means that member states of entities such as the Grand Commonwealth and CIS shall be treated as individual nations, with their own separate militaries, unless stated otherwise." Ok thanks for informing us Ben. However I would like to enquire as to why the CIS would have to have individual armies when we are to be listed as one entity on the MCS. Surely if we are listed as such on the MCS, our army would be as one too? Appologies for taking your time, and thanks for visiting us  King James I of Jamzinia |
|
|
|
Post by drspangle on Jul 8, 2006 15:09:25 GMT -5
look, why not both, an army for cis as a whole and an army for each. good i'm glad you agree... it makes everyone happy this way.
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Jul 9, 2006 3:34:13 GMT -5
look, why not both, an army for cis as a whole and an army for each. good i'm glad you agree... it makes everyone happy this way. ;D Like Recwars will allow that.. come on spangle use some common sence  |
|
|
|
Post by drspangle on Jul 9, 2006 7:41:10 GMT -5
meh... they could... they should...
|
|
|
|
Post by King Joseph I on Jul 10, 2006 3:34:17 GMT -5
well you could if a set amount of your army was placed into it I think?
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Jul 10, 2006 3:50:27 GMT -5
well you could if a set amount of your army was placed into it I think? That's a good idea. I could see that being more likely! |
|
|
|
Post by King Joseph I on Jul 10, 2006 7:17:53 GMT -5
Yer so each member nation has to put a set number of troops which will be discussed between military head and the president. So for example nation x is peaceful and has a rather small army then it only puts in a small contrebution and would fund the CIS army so it has suficent logistics.
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Jul 10, 2006 7:54:48 GMT -5
Yer so each member nation has to put a set number of troops which will be discussed between military head and the president. So for example nation x is peaceful and has a rather small army then it only puts in a small contrebution and would fund the CIS army so it has suficent logistics. Exactly, plus it would be a good idea for nations to have control of their own troops within Recwars. Maybe we could do as you said Joe - and ask member nations to contribute a certain amount towards CIS forces. |
|
|
|
Post by King Thomas of Gosling on Jul 10, 2006 9:52:29 GMT -5
what if they are pacifists?
|
|
|
|
Post by drspangle on Jul 10, 2006 10:34:34 GMT -5
then they do not have to put in any troops to the army as they have no army!, it should be something like if you are peaceful you put in so and so percent rather than troops, i.e. instead of saying peaceful nations give the cis army 1000 troops they give them 10% so it is fair to nations with different size armys! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by King Joseph I on Jul 10, 2006 18:04:44 GMT -5
what if they are pacifists? A pacifist nation would fund logistics for the war such as suppling food trucks jeeps etc.... |
|
