|
|
Post by James on Aug 22, 2006 14:24:38 GMT -5
Votes appreciated
|
|
|
|
Post by drspangle on Aug 22, 2006 15:03:25 GMT -5
james and i have had an agreement on msn, i feel i should post it here to stop other people complaining to/about me:
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Aug 22, 2006 15:52:12 GMT -5
Indeed.
|
|
|
|
Post by separatist on Aug 22, 2006 18:04:06 GMT -5
I think Spangle, like James and Tom is a key member of the CIS and a true Confederate and has been since its founding. I think on the contrary, all of you have done nothing but make the CIS strong. I mean which other micronation could still be standing and standing strong after a year - even with me making two attempts on it's existance?  |
|
|
|
Post by drspangle on Aug 23, 2006 4:53:29 GMT -5
and with the several times everyone gets angry with me ;D every president has got angry qwith me and always we end up coming to some agreement, althought this is the first time it's not just been for me to forget about it ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Colonel Vilhelm/Senechal Sfeir on Aug 26, 2006 13:32:30 GMT -5
Sorry James, but I have to agree with Spangle on certain levels. You aren't destroying the CIS - simply leading it into a direction other than that intended by the founder and a few of the members. Of course, Sep might feel that you are only making the CIS stronger, but I disagree. One thing you may have noticed (as I actually mentioned this to you via MSN) is that I disagreed with the outreach to Woodrow. I have nothing against Woodrow - in fact, I am closer than ever with him, although I have never been close to him really. I am all for Woodstania and the CIS but I believe that together they might be somewhat explosive. Also, there are a few minor things that have been nibbling away at my faith in you over your term as president - for example, the lack of a constitutional rewrite (I've rewritten it, I might post it sometime, although the way things are going it would be rejected), and the attempt at a New CIS look. There are just a few things that bothered me.
In short, I preferred it when you made your voice heard in the CIS and your views obvious rather than when you actually controlled it.
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Aug 26, 2006 14:12:05 GMT -5
Opinions are opinions. That's yours. I disagree, and 5 others do too. So to be honest, couldn't carelss about your fears and complaints.  And a decent constitutional rewrite takes longer than a few days. I doubt you know fully what I have planned. |
|
|
|
Post by Colonel Vilhelm/Senechal Sfeir on Aug 26, 2006 14:18:43 GMT -5
The thing to consider, James, is that you don't even need to rewrite the CIS Constitution. All you need to do is reshuffle it and fill in the blanks. What I have done (see Senate). I don't understand what you need to do to make it better...
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Aug 26, 2006 14:25:39 GMT -5
I know you don't understand what I need to make it better, that's been illustrated. Fortunately, I do.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colonel Vilhelm/Senechal Sfeir on Aug 26, 2006 14:27:48 GMT -5
So why not tell me rather than assume the whole mysterious superiority routine?
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Aug 26, 2006 14:29:08 GMT -5
I'll tell you once I have finished disscussing it with Tom. It'd be nice to stop pressurising me into telling you now . I'll tell you when it's ready.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Thomas of Gosling on Aug 28, 2006 11:27:55 GMT -5
im back, so tell me on msn.
|
|
|
|
Post by drspangle on Aug 28, 2006 11:50:34 GMT -5
can someone give me a hint? ;D
|
|
